Who are you? Why are you here? Personality testing?
August 3rd, 2018 by Matt Anderson at Troutman Sanders
This blog was written by Matt Anderson at Troutman Sanders, author of the Georgia Human Resources Manual. You can find the original article and their HR Law Matters blog on their website.
Many employers require employees and applicants to take personality testing (think Myers-Briggs). Others are seriously considering adding this as a component of their hiring and employee engagement efforts. Companies want to get a sense of an individual’s opinions, attitudes, feelings, motivations, preferences, interests, emotional makeup, and style of interacting with others. This information, some believe, can help employers make predictions regarding job performance and success. At the very least, it allows employers to get to know an applicant through more than just the traditional interview process. These tests, however, raise many legal issues, particularly in the areas of potential discrimination claims and privacy concerns.
As an initial recognition, personality is not a protected class. Indeed, courts have routinely held that someone’s personality is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason to not hire an applicant or take adverse employment action against an employee. Yet personality testing still has the potential of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). For example, if an applicant can show that the personality trait for which the employer screened was really a mask for discrimination of a protected class, the employer could be found to violate federal discrimination laws. So, if the employer is screening for a personality trait it connects with a protected class and makes its decisions based on that trait (possibly as a proxy or substitute for that class), that can constitute discrimination.
Furthermore, Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA all have requirements for all employee testing that employers must adhere to when giving a personality test. For example, Title VII permits employers to administer professionally developed ability tests and take action based on the result. But, such tests must be implemented in a way that does not discriminate against protected classes, and ideally validated in advance as not having a discriminatory effect. Furthermore, employers are prohibited from adjusting the test scores based on an individual’s protected characteristics; using different cut-off scores for different protected classes; or otherwise altering the results of the test in any way. Lastly, the test must be job-related for the position at issue and consistent with a business necessity.
Testing clearly presents risks – of claims of discrimination, in addition to actual proof of such behavior. There have been numerous lawsuits related to personality testing under the ADA, Title VII, and the ADEA, with topics litigated including:
- allegations of bias in determining traits important for the job
- an employer purportedly asking questions that implicate protected characteristics
- claims of bias in administration and scoring
- whether the testing is a prohibited pre-offer medical examination
- whether the test suggests a disability or a perceived disability based on the results, and
- allegations of administering the test to discriminate based on age.
So, before you implement, add or change tests for employees or applicants, you will want to consider the risks they pose and balance that against the expected benefits of the testing.
Personality tests also raise potential privacy issues. While personality tests do not appear to violate the federal Employee Polygraph Protection Act, they may violate more restrictive state laws. For example, a Massachusetts law prohibits testing that renders an opinion on a job applicant’s honesty. Employers may also face claims based on the intrusiveness of the questioning (i.e., the questions are highly personal and/or offensive), or a failure to protect the privacy of the results. These state-law claims have thus far been brought have not seen notable success, but they have also not been tested nationwide, and new state and local privacy laws are enacted every year.
As personality testing becomes more and more popular among employers, interpretations of existing laws will inevitably become clearer and more settled. But new laws will likely join them, creating regular confusion and doubt. The best bet is to work your favorite employment counsel to help review and craft a personality testing policy that both conforms with existing law and is flexible enough to evolve as the issue changes over time.
Just like a dog, a hire can be bad for a multitude of reasons, including the hirer (trainer), the hired (dog), everyone's expectations (in both cases some praise and/or a treat), and the environment (workplace/home).
HR Dive is here to help (with the bad hire*):
"Sooner or later, even the m...
This blog was written by John Monroe and Kristina Griffin at FordHarrison, which authors our "Hiring, Firing and Discipline for Employers" and "An Employer's Guide to FMLA and ADA". You can find the original blog post and their Legal Alerts on their website.
Welcome to the Holiday Season!...
This blog was written by Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. You can find the original article and their Legal Alerts on their website.
The Freeze Is On: Employers Must Immediately Update Background Check Forms
There is a little-known provision from a new federal...
This blog was written by Judy Yi at Polsinelli. Polsinelli authors hrsimple resources in Missouri, Kansas and Illinois. You can find the original blog post and their labor and employment blog Polsinelli at Work (which is excellent) on their website.
Five Issues When An Employer Is Consi...
This blog was written by Spencer Waldron at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. You can find the original post and the Employment Privacy Blog (which is excellent) on their website.
How Much Do You Really Want to Know About Your Employees? The Growing Popularity of Co...
Interviewer: So where do you see yourself in five years?
Applicant: I'd say my biggest weakness is listening.
Maybe the questions you ask haven't changed (and maybe not the answers you get either), but the process of hiring – ZipRecruiter, downloads, videos, Indeed, resume filters – has.
This blog was written by Patricia Dammann, VP Programs & Operations/OD Strategist at Institute of Organization Development. You can find the original article here.
Attracting and retaining millennials using a strategic talent management approach
It all started with a simple question...
Well, maybe he didn't necessarily write the job description, more like he personalized it.
And a personalized job description should make for a more engaged employee, n'est-ce pas?
Vivek Patel from SAP shares in the Harvard Business Review something that all of us know, whether HR specialis...
This blog was written by Natasha Sarah-Lorraine Banks at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. You can find the original here and their Wage and Hour Laws Blog here.
Hiring Minors in the Heat of the Summer: What Employers Need to Know
Summertime is quickly approachin...
This blog is courtesy of the Iowa Association of Business and Industry (ABI) and can be found on their website here.
Recently, ABI named workforce issues its number one legislative priority for the 2018 session and reported many of its members have difficulty finding qualified workers. T...
This blog is an excerpt from our book Wages and Hours – An Employer's Guide by Jill S. Kirila, Meghan E. Hill and Shennan Harris at Squire Patton Boggs. For more information, go to the Products tab above and click on "Federal" to subscribe.
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), “wage...
Do new hires have to be a culture club fit? Patty McCord, former chief talent officer of Netflix doesn't think so. READ THIS deep dive (3500+ words) from Patty, SHRM and Harvard Business Review.
In Patty's words: "The process requires:
probing beneath the surface of people and their ré...
Needless to say, a company can’t operate (let alone succeed) if the employees aren’t showing up to work. But how do you ensure that your workforce will consistently report for duty? One good step is having a clear attendance policy. Communicating clearly about what are acceptable reasons to miss ...
This blog is an excerpt from our book Hiring, Firing and Discipline for Employers, authored by Frank Day, Robbin Hutton and Jessica Asbridge at Ford Harrison LLP. For more state specific information, go to the Products tab above and subscribe to the Human Resources Manual for your state.
Not all employers provide employees with vacation time, but for those who do it is wise to have a clear, well-enforced policy in place to prevent confusion and help employees understand what steps need to be followed in order to use their time off. If employers decide to provide time off they nee...
Finding new employees can be stressful. Sure, an applicant will say they are a hardworking overachiever, but are they being honest? That's where reference checks come in. For most positions, it is beneficial for an employer to request and contact previous employers to check on perspective employe...
While there may be no state or federal law requiring an employer to have a handbook, there are a number or reasons why they are in an employer’s best interest.
Usefulness. It is beneficial for there to be one definitive source on the terms of employment. If an employee ever has a question ...
As an HR professional you are no stranger to paperwork. It seems that for every employment action – applying, interviewing, hiring, disciplining, on and on – there is a specific form that needs to be filled out. Making sure you complete the paperwork properly is only half the battle though. Once ...