New I-9!

February 14th, 2020

Julie Pace, David A. Selden, Heidi Nunn-Gilman

Download PDF

On January 31, 2020, USCIS issued a new version of the Form I-9. All employers must use the new Form I-9 by April 30, 2020. 

The newest version of the Form I-9 is dated 10/21/2019 in the bottom left corner, with the expiration date of 10/31/2022 in the top right. Employers can use either the 074/17/17 or the 10/21/2019 Form I-9 through April 30, 2020. After April 30, 2020, only the 10/21/2019 Form I-9 will be valid to complete. Completing an older version of the Form I-9 is considered a technical error and can result in fines if employers have previously been through an I-9 audit with ICE. 

Employers are required to complete and maintain a Form I-9 to verify identification and authorization to work in the United States for all employees hired on or after November 6, 1986. 

The changes to the new Form I-9 are primarily to the Instructions. Please have the I-9 instructions available to employees. Many companies print the new I-9 instructions and place a stapled copy on the bulletin board of required employment posters so that the instructions are available to employees. It is a good practice to print and have the List A, B and C posted or available to employees so that the employees refer to this list to choose one document from list A or one document from list B and C to present to the employer to complete the I-9 form. 

Employers using the paper version of the Form I-9 will not notice any changes, other than to the date of issuance and expiration. On the PDF version of the I-9 with drop down menus, the name of the country of Swaziland was changed to Eswatini. 

Among the changes to the Form I-9 instructions is a clarification that a company can designate any person to complete the Form I-9 on behalf of the company, but that the Company remains liable for any violations of the law. This is intended to address the increase in remote employees and clarify that third parties can be a designated company representative or agent. 

The instructions have also been updated to specifically state that if the employee presents a List B and List C document, the employer should not enter document information into List A. Over- documentation, which is recording more documents than required on the Form I-9, is considered a discriminatory practice under the anti-discrimination provisions of IRCA and the revised instructions are intended to help reduce over-documentation. Violations of document abuse leads to penalties. 

Under the Trump Administration, the number of worksite enforcement audits has increased, with approximately 6,000 audits in FY 2018 and an additional 6,000 in FY 2019. ICE has stated that they intend to continue this record number of I-9 audits. Employers should take steps to ensure that they are prepared for an I-9 audit. Companies should be completing internal I-9 and E-Verify training regularly, conducting internal audits and ensuring immigration compliance is occurring at their companies. 

Employers should ensure that the company has a fully complete Form I-9 for every employee hired after November 6, 1986. Employers who use E-Verify should also ensure that they are properly completing E-Verify, discussing any tentative non-confirmation with the employee, keeping the signed Further Action Notices, and following proper procedures. Gammage & Burnham offers a wide array of legal services involving the Form I-9, E-Verify, immigration compliance, audits, and employment law issues including training employers to understand their immigration compliance obligations, while avoiding harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.

For more information, see the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website.

This blog was written by Julie Pace, David A. Selden and Heidi Nunn-Gilman at Gammage & Burnham, authors of our Employment Verification - An Employer's Guide to Immigration, Form I-9 and E-Verify and Arizona Human Resources Manual. You can find the original article and their News & Events on their website.

IA Waterloo - Will Ban the Box be your Waterloo?
Can you require new employees not to bash you on Glassdoor?
MD Reasonable accommodation: qualified > most qualified?
Pre-Employment Testing
Pre-employment issues
IL Artificial hiring, salary history, required training, etc.
Expired I-9 not expired (yet)
Employment verification – a simple audit
Hiring, firing and discipline - a simple audit
Dumb questions and other interviewing do's and don'ts
How to Ghostbuster a new hire or applicant
Bad hire! Bad, bad hire!
Help hiring holiday help here
Mr. Freeze unveils National Security Freeze tagline: "They can't steal your identity if it's frozen"
Employment agreements – what to do before you do
Background checks of the future are continuous
Who are you? Why are you here? Personality testing?
Technology driving the hiring process
Dr. Strangelabor or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Millennial
Did Bartleby the scrivener write his own job description?
Hiring under the age of 18
Looking for employees: an untapped source of talent
Non-exempt employees – what counts as wages?
Do new hires have to be a culture club fit?
Attendance policies
Hiring interviews
Vacation policies and time off
Employment references
Employee handbooks – getting a handle on your policies
Employee personnel files
No-match letters – IRS alert or Charles Nelson Reilly game show?
Employment verification sample memorandums
Immigration and employment
Criminal enforcement and I-9 audits
NY Reporting immigration status can be unneighborly . . . at best
No-match letters from the SSA - read and understand, then react
I've changed my name – to Optimus Prime
ICE audits II – FAQs to make you wiser
Be prepared for ICE raids