The ACA - uninsured? unconstitutional? unenforceable? ununderstandable?

December 20th, 2018 by Fisher Phillips


This blog was written Fisher Phillips, which authors our South Carolina Human Resources ManualModel Policies and Forms for Missouri EmployersModel Policies and Forms for Kansas Employers, and Workplace Safety and Health Compliance Manual. You can find the original article and more Legal Alerts on their website.

 

ACA Ruled Unconstitutional, But It’s Status Quo For Employers—For Now

Fisher Phillips

A Texas federal judge dealt a serious blow to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) late Friday afternoon, ruling that the tax reform law passed by Congress in late 2017 rendered the healthcare law unconstitutional. While U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor’s 55-page opinion overturns the entirety of the law on a national basis, his ruling does not include any sort of injunction that would immediately cause employers to alter their practices with respect to benefit administration. The law remains in place for the foreseeable future, but it certainly stands on shakier ground today than it did just a few days ago.

ACA Under Assault Once Again

The Obama-era healthcare law has faced legal challenges several times before. In fact, the Supreme Court has twice upheld the law as constitutional in both 2012 and 2015. In the former decision, Chief Justice Roberts concluded for the majority that the ACA penalty against those who do not carry health insurance is constitutional because Congress has “the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance.”

But late last year, when Congress passed its tax reform law, that ACA penalty was wiped away. The Texas Attorney General, joined by a consortium of 18 other state attorneys general and a governor, initiated a lawsuit attacking the ACA soon thereafter, arguing that the elimination of the linchpin penalty provision rendered the entire law unconstitutional. “Once the heart of the ACA — the individual mandate — is declared unconstitutional,” the lawsuit contended, “the remainder of the ACA must also fall.”

In his December 14 ruling, Judge O’Connor agreed with this line of argument. He ruled that the insurance requirement was “essential to and inseverable from the remainder of the ACA.” He noted that “Congress stated many times unequivocally—through enacted text signed by the president—that the individual mandate is ‘essential’ to the ACA,” and its removal rendered the entire law outside the authority of the constitution.

This caught many by surprise, as the Trump administration had simply argued in joining the attack on the law that the removal of the insurance mandate’s penalty would merely invalidate some of the statute’s consumer protections, but that the remainder of the law could remain in force as legally distinct. The Justice Department did not support striking down the law as unconstitutional but instead declined to defend the individual mandate and certain coverage and cost provisions for those with pre-existing health conditions.    

The Texas judge was not constrained by these recommendations and concluded that the penalty’s elimination had a much more profound impact, the effect of which could influence a host of other health coverage issues, including Medicaid expansion; annual and lifetime coverage limits; the employer coverage mandate; federal health care reimbursement rates for hospitals; coverage for adults up to age 26 under their parents’ plan; and caps on out-of-pocket costs.

What’s Next? 

A group of 17 Democratic attorneys general stood in to defend the law during the Texas litigation, and have announced that they will continue their fight at the appellate court level. Their argument, reduced to its essence: while the tax reform law certainly eliminated the penalty for being uninsured, the removal of that provision of the law does not render the entire ACA unconstitutional.

If the defenders of the ACA continue their fight, the case will be heard by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, likely at some point in 2019. There is a chance that the Supreme Court could agree to bypass that level of review and take up the case immediately. But even if the Justices prefer for the case to make its way up to their docket in due course, it seems inevitable that the highest court in the land will have its say about the ACA, once again.

What Does This Mean For Employers?

The ACA may be at top of mind for many of your employees right now, especially because this past Saturday was the deadline for individuals in most states to enroll in the law’s insurance exchange program. For this reason, and because of the widespread media coverage the decision received over the weekend, you may be faced with a barrage of questions about healthcare coverage from your workers over the next few days.

The easy answer you can provide: nothing will change now or for the foreseeable future.  The more specific answers you can provide are:

  • there are no impacts to current coverage;
  • there are no impacts to 2019 coverage;
  • Friday’s ruling had no impact on state enrollments through HealthCare.gov for coverage effective January 1 (which ended Saturday, December 15); and
  • employees with coverage in the District of Columbia or one of the 11 states that operate their own Marketplaces (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington) should determine if they still have an opportunity to enroll. Several of those states have responded to the Texas ruling by extending Saturday’s deadline until December 21, and several of those states already have January deadlines for February 1 coverage.

Unfortunately, the longer-term answer is harder to deliver. No one can predict how an appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court will treat this decision as the case winds its way up the judicial system on review, and it remains to be seen whether a fractured Congress and the president can develop revisions to the law that would satisfy the courts and the American people. 

Fisher Phillips will continue to monitor developments, so you should ensure you are subscribed to Fisher Phillips’ alert system to gather the most up-to-date information. For help with compliance steps or to answer questions, please contact your Fisher Phillips attorney or the authors of this Alert.



Related posts

HR Webinars
Labor and Employment Update After the Midterms - Looking Ahead to 2019
January 22nd, 2019 at 12:27pm CST by Frederick L. Warren, Henry F. Warnock, Patrick L. Ryan, Chelsey M. Lewis

Cultivating Diversity & Inclusion: Actions With Impact
January 24th, 2019 at 10:00am CST by Sujata Chaudhry, Founder & CEO Tangible Development

2019 Employment Law Series: What Employers Need to Know About Revised ADA and FMLA Regulations
January 29th, 2019 at 1:00pm CST by Heidi Eckert, Karen Milnet, Matthew Banocy, Jamie Mahler Westbrook

WA – New Year, New Employment Laws
January 31st, 2019 at 9:00am CST by Stephanie Berntsen and Farron Curry

Romance in the workplace – or – Office dating pools need lifeguards too
February 6th, 2019 at 11:00am CST by Greg Grisham

PA Why self insurance is right for your company
February 21st, 2019 at 11:00am CST by Amy Brida and Dee Yingst, HR consultants for PA Chamber Insurance


HR Articles
Protecting trade secrets when terminating employees
RIFs are NOT a cure all for crappy performance management
Paying tipped employees no longer requires 80 or 20
Why should I care about employment law?
Government shutdown and human resources – do they intersect?
Employee privacy – more than just protecting social security numbers.
Written warnings and the FAQs they spawn
Rushhourtraffobia does not require reasonable accommodation
Workplace Christmas Quiz (this is legit and will secondarily eat up some time before you get to go home)
The ACA - uninsured? unconstitutional? unenforceable? ununderstandable?
List 10 Up: Top ten holiday party tips
Holiday party what-would-you-dos
2019 minimum wage chart
Save the Office Holiday Party
MeToo, avoiding women, and the modified Mike Pence Rule
Carnac the Magnificent says – Politicussin
Non-competes for non-skilled – non-productive, non-legal, non-enforceable?
Discrimination CHARGE! – Step 3 Cause or no cause, because you gotta do something
Discrimination CHARGE! – Step 2 Go Kim Possible for the investigation phase
Discrimination CHARGE! – Step 1 Don't panic, ask questions
Depression – what can an employer do?
Employers beware - what you say can and will be used against you
Holiday stew – ingredients for a happy and non-litigious holiday
MO - The weed du jour - marijuana médicale
Biometrics in the workplace - not a measure of bios accumulated by an employee
Thanks-giving isn't just about turkeys - include the good employees too
The best "stay" to help you retain employees
Overtime, daylight savings time and circadian rhythyms
Controlling the political speech of buttons*
Cursing, surfing, weapons, gadgets – illegal, inappropriate or OK?
How to Ghostbuster a new hire or applicant
Election leave – employer's civic duty, migraine, or just wishful thinking (election, leave!)
Costumes, booze and the Great Pumpkin – beware the office Halloween party
Disability – Dr. or employee approved?
401(k) plan + payroll provider = 401k good things
Disability/pregnancy practices – what not to practice
Bad hire! Bad, bad hire!
TN – A drug-free workplace program is good
Open enrollment – personalizing perks pays off
Unpaid intern – depends on who benefits
The #1 office perk is . . . ?
FMLA leave before being eligible for FMLA leave
IL – Required expense reimbursement for your employees, not Bill Self
Help hiring holiday help here
Are the new DOL opinion letters like noses?
Public disclosure of confidential information is easier than you think
Bad mix – accommodation request and firing
If religious accommodation and a flu shot both equal angst, is that the transitive or substitution property?
Workplace shootings – 20 can-dos to prevent them
No call/no show shows. No what about it.
List 10 Up: Top tips for starting a workplace incident interview
Mr. Freeze unveils National Security Freeze tagline: "They can't steal your identity if it's frozen"
If it's called a dress code, can I wear pants?
I've changed my name – to Optimus Prime
TN: Conceal and carry means post to prohibit or permit
I'll take "ADA in 5s?" please Alex
Swearing at work – 7 rules
Is that red light flashing?
Four-legged office mates and the pawternity policies they benefit
Notice: notices and forms for FMLA that were already expired now updated virtually unchanged
Don't feel ripped off when you get ripped off – get even
School-related parental leave does not mean you forge a note from your kid
NY: Draft model sexual harassment policy/training released
Discipline - Demote - Depart or Communicate - Counsel - Channel
ICE audits II – FAQs to make you wiser
Round up stew: sick leave, harassment, non-compete, etc.
Identifying trade secrets does not mean figuring out how to barter better
Being at work full time is not an essential function of a job?
List 10 up: Positive employee relations training: reap the benefits of engagement
Employment agreements – what to do before you do
Background checks of the future are continuous
Treating service animal requests (always treat the animal)
Prepare for saying "No" – you need to decide how to refuse service
List 10 up: What's the deal with employee handbook rules?
I cannot tell a lie . . . you're fired for cutting down the cherry tree
Milk Stork delivers for working mom's and their baby
Job tasks and essential functions under the ADA
Who are you? Why are you here? Personality testing?
No, you can't sleep on the job
Technology driving the hiring process
Should you give your employees a little Slack – or do they have enough already?
"We need to talk" isn't any easier to say than to hear
Bet employers must make: call and raise your minimum wage
Zero tolerance for "zero tolerance" policies
Ralph Waldo Emerson as a productivity consultant
PS: PTSD IRL*
Is the employee "disabled" under the ADA?
The six step DOL audit polka
PTO on the house!
New rules for work rules
Dr. Strangelabor or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Millennial
Did Bartleby the scrivener write his own job description?
"Treating" disgruntled or bad behaving employees
Hiring under the age of 18
DO NOT LICK THE BRAIN! and other obvious stuff
Helping your employees save for emergencies
Right to bare arms in the workplace
#MeToo quiz
Under standing desks
How to approach an employee showing signs of cognitive decline
Dress codes should not be encoded
Foul language *
Rorschach, Horshack and Abednego
Don't ask a woman the gender of her child, especially. . .
Guidelines for a valid no-solicitation/no-distribution policy
All aboard the Love Train for long-term onboarding!
Gender and workplace bathrooms
No FMLA for pet's death
Personal hygiene in the workplace
Yes Virginia, there is a St. Patrick's Day in Ireland
Master the modern method for managing March Madness
Drug testing in The Office
Background checks
"Thank you" and "I'm sorry" – meaningful, simple and impactful
Michael Corleone HR tip for the day
S'not flu or it is, doesn't matter
Be prepared for ICE raids
Looking for employees: an untapped source of talent
Calling Dr. Love(less)
Non-exempt employees – what counts as wages?
HR is not a happy accident
Do new hires have to be a culture club fit?
Remote workers and telecommuting
When former employees ask for references
Model written lock out/tag out program
Wrong table cat
They might be giants . . . transforming healthcare?
Conducting internal I-9 audits
The Nebraska Chamber has issued a W-2 challenge to state taxpayers
The impact of super bowl(ing)
12 steps to handling violence in the workplace
Workplace retaliation: don't give in to the Dark Side
Would you really want to work with a bunch of yous?
What is the ADA?
Monty Python should not write your job descriptions
FMLA definitions
Unemployed or wear a bra – are those the only choices?
What "government shutdown" means for employers
An intern by any other name
FMLA - "leave" as in "leave the employee alone"
 “M,” “F,” Or “X”? Nonbinary Gender Designations in the Workplace
Sexual harassment – can't find it – what now?
Probationary periods
Employee contracts
Introverts
How to treat fringe benefits for employees
Attendance policies
Different repeal
Temporary and leased employees
Birthdays in the workplace
Needy employees
Holiday parties - acknowledge, avoid, assume (nothing)
Dress codes: who, what, wear
Punch clock
Nepotism: favoring relatives and friends in the workplace
Year-end performance reviews
Hiring interviews
The Form I-9 has changed… Again!
Service dogs at work
Bring your own gun
Social media
Year-end or holiday incentives
Arizona sick day policy
Paternity leave
HRsimple spotlight - Fiona Ong
Permissible post-accident drug testing
Paid family leave: a growing trend
Politics in the workplace: how to remain legally compliant during election season
Termination Series: Communicating the reason for discharge
It’s only a matter of overtime
Interview with attorneys at Kastner Westman & Wilkins
Valentine's Day heartaches around the office
Safety and health tips
Wearable technology
Favorite HR sites
Back to school time is here!
Vacation policies and time off
Interview with author J. Hagood Tighe
Non-compete agreements
Workplace romance
Holidays
Bullying in the workplace
Employment references
Telecommuting or remote (control) workers
Social media and employment
Performance evaluations
Breaktimes
Interview with attorneys at Wilson Worley PC
Interview with attorneys at Knudsen Law Firm
Interview with Kathy Speaker MacNett
Firing, a job to do right the first time
Job advertisement do’s and don’ts
Employee handbooks – getting a handle on your policies
Technology in the workplace
Interview questions: do's and don'ts
Employee personnel files