I cannot tell a lie . . . you're fired for cutting down the cherry tree

August 8th, 2018 by Robin Shea at Constangy


This blog was written by Robin Shea at Constangy, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Georgia Employers. You can find the original on their Employment & Labor Insider blog (which is one of our favorites and is excellent).

 

Second-guessing the advice columns: Don't lie about why you terminated an employee.

I'm don't quite agree with the legal analysis, but I agree with the principle.

This week, Greg Giangrande, @Work advice columnist for the New York Post, had a situation that drives me crazy as an employer's lawyer. The column won't be available on the Post website for non-subscribers to read until next week (I think?), but here's the gist of the letter writer's concern, some of which is quoted directly from the column, and Greg's answer, which is quoted verbatim:

READER: After my employer merged with another company, I was told that my position was being eliminated. I signed a severance agreement with a release of claims so I could get the money. Then I found out that my boss did not eliminate my position. Instead, he fired me so that he could hire a friend of his to replace me. Do I have any recourse?

GREG: Yes, you do! Public or private, if any company provides a false reason for your termination as a pretext to let you go, they could still be held liable for unlawful termination, even if you signed a waiver. A court would likely invalidate all or part of it if you can prove your claim. Get your facts in order and see a good employment lawyer. If they think you have a claim, they may take the case on contingency.

Greg is both right and wrong. First, he is right that the letter writer should get some legal advice. But whether the letter writer has a valid legal claim . . . er, that's not so clear.Dear Abby "I always advise people never to give advice." P.G.Woodhouse

We have not heard the employer's side of the story, so what this person wrote to Greg may not be true. For purposes of our discussion today, I'm going to assume it's true.

Assuming the story is true, here's the sad truth:

No. 1: The agreement the employee signed surely had a complete release of all claims, including claims of employment discrimination under Title VII, the New York State Human Rights Law, and, if applicable, the New York City Human Rights Law. (Assuming the writer is in New York, which he may not be.)

No. 2: "Pretext" -- a dishonest reason for the termination -- is not much of a legal issue unless the lie is being used to conceal an unlawful motive. Let's say I fire you because of your race, which is clearly against the law. I don't want to admit that I'm breaking the law, so I make up a story that you aren't meeting our performance standards. In fact, your performance is no worse than that of anybody else in your department, but you're the only member of your race, and you're the only one being fired. If you file a charge or sue me for race discrimination, you can prove your case in part by showing that your performance was, in fact, acceptable. Or, at least, that your co-workers weren't any better than you and they were not fired. By showing that I lied about the reason for your termination, you allow an agency, judge, or jury to conclude that the real reason was race discrimination. Which is clearly against the law, so you win.

On the other hand, let's say you are the worst employee in the history of work, and I fire you for that reason. Then I lie and tell you it's a "job elimination" so I won't hurt your feelings and maybe to help you qualify for unemployment. Even if you can prove that I lied about the "job elimination," you probably wouldn't get too far in court because I'll be able to show that you were indeed the world's worst employee, which is a legal reason for termination. Yes, I lied, but not to conceal an illegal motive.

Between these two extremes are terminations that are unfair-but-legal. This would include, in most jurisdictions, firing a perfectly good employee so you can hire one of your pals instead. Or your son-in-law. Believe it or not, that is usually legal. If an employer lies to cover up this type of termination, then the lie is probably not relevant to any type of legal claim against the employer. Because the true reason is not illegal, the fact that the employer lied about it isn't usually pertinent.

(I say "usually" because in many cases there will be a dispute about what the real reason for termination was. In those cases, the employer's lie would be one piece of the puzzle.)

No. 3: Lying about the reason for an employee's termination -- in itself -- is not usually a legitimate basis for a wrongful termination lawsuit. In most jurisdictions, and I believe this would include New York, you can't sue an employer just for telling you a lie about why you were terminated.

No. 4: Because nepotism, cronyism, and favoritism are generally legal (bad HR practices, but legal), and because lying to an employee about the reason for termination is generally legal (a bad HR practice, but legal), this letter writer may not have much recourse after all.

No. 5: As Greg correctly notes, the employee may be able to invalidate the separation agreement (including the release of claims) based on the employer's misrepresentation. He maybe able to claim that he was fraudulently induced into signing a separation agreement that he would not have signed had he known the truth. 

No. 6: But, even if so, what would be the point, if the true reason for the termination was still a legal one? I think the employee loses, even if he's "released from his release," because it is generally not illegal to fire an employee because of cronyism, nepotism, or favoritism. He may be better off sticking with the separation agreement and collecting his severance pay.

No. 7: That said, I agree with Greg that the letter writer should consult an employment lawyer to see what his best course of action would be. (Of course I do!)

Employers, be like this guy.


Now, for you employers. Please don't lie to employees about the reasons they are being let go, even if the true reason was a lawful one. If an employee is being fired, then say so and provide at least a general truthful explanation. Conversely, if you tell an employee that his or her position is being eliminated, or that he or she is being RIF'd, make sure that is really the case. If you lie, and if an employee has any basis to sue you over the termination, your "pretext" will give the employee a chance of getting to a jury.

Honesty really is the best policy. 

Robin Shea

Image Credits: From flickr, Creative Commons license. Dear Abby by Ray MacLean, George Washington ("I cannot tell a lie") by History Rewound.





Can't find what you're looking for?

Sign up for free to gain access to our complete HR Library


Free Webinar
Zoinks! Generation Z joins the workplace

August 8th, 2019 at 11:30am CDT

SHRM & HRCI certified

Related posts

Summertime and HR - dress codes, office picnics, manning the grill

Miss Mannerly answers your summer HR questions Avoid a seasonal faux pas! Dear Miss Mannerly: My office is business casual -- until June. Even though we don't have a lax summer dress code, many of our employees just "assume" they can dress like hooligans. We have all the usual problems -...

RIF - Reductions In Force Require Initial Fundamentals

Avoiding Discrimination Claims as the Result of a Reduction in Force Although the current economic indicators signal a healthy economy, many experts think that we will experience subdued economic growth in 2019 and 2020. In the midst of these uncertainties, some companies that grew a little to...

FMLA - speak clearly and carefully and explicitly

Be VERY CLEAR In Your Communications About FMLA! I often tell my crazy teenagers that it doesn’t matter what you mean to say – it matters what the other person actually hears. (I’m not sure they actually hear me when I say that…) And a recent Family and Medical Leave Act case proves my point a...

Termination and social media posts - peanut butter and vinegar?

#No Filter: Terminating an Employee for Social Media Posts Prior to the advent of social media and especially the #MeToo movement, employers were generally comfortable drawing a bright line between what employees did on their own time and workplace misconduct.  Those bygone times, however, hav...

How to Address an Unflattering Video of an Employee

Memo for Unflattering Social Media Content A PR statement employers may want to save for a rainy day. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: TBD (embargo until needed) Contact: Corporate Communications Director Our company is an equal opportunity employer, and we take pride in our diversity. Toda...

Protecting Trade Secrets when Terminating Employees

4 Tips to Protect Trade Secrets and Confidential Information When Terminating Employee Employers may face risks of departing employees, particularly involuntarily terminated employees, taking the employer’s confidential information or trade secrets with them when they leave.  Putting aside the...

RIFs are NOT a cure all for bad performance management

RIFs Are Not the Easy Solution for Problem Employees Some employers view a reduction in force as an apparently easy and clean way to get rid of employees they do not want – like poor performers, who have not been properly performance-managed.  There may even be less appropriate considerations ...

Why You Should Care About Employment Law

Common Pitfalls for Emerging Companies Founders of emerging companies are often first-time employers and find themselves having to wade through the dense patchwork of state and federal labor and employment laws. This can be a confusing undertaking that often requires legal counsel. However, th...

Written warnings and the FAQs they spawn

The DOs and DON’Ts of Written Warnings: What Employers Need to Know Ursula A. Kienbaum Employers frequently use written warnings as part of their formal progressive discipline policies. How and when to use these warnings can sometimes be tricky. Below are answers to some frequently asked qu...

Cursing, surfing, weapons, gadgets – illegal, inappropriate or OK?

It happens in almost every workplace almost every day: somebody swears or is on an iffy website or is carrying a knife (or worse) or is using their own (not secure) phone or computer to send off a quick business email or text. So what is illegal, what is inappropriate and what is just not that...

Bad hire! Bad, bad hire!

Just like a dog, a hire can be bad for a multitude of reasons, including the hirer (trainer), the hired (dog), everyone's expectations (in both cases some praise and/or a treat), and the environment (workplace/home). HR Dive is here to help (with the bad hire*): "Sooner or later, even the m...

Don't feel ripped off when you get ripped off – get even

Both of the following blogs were written by Ed Harold at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. Both are included in their entirety below. You can find the originals, Part One and Part Two, and their Retail Industry Update on their website.   A Step-By-Step Guide To Term...

Discipline - Demote - Depart or Communicate - Counsel - Channel

SHRM, with help from author Ogletree Deakins, explains the process of demoting an employee, including: reasons for demotion opportunities/fresh start pay reduction not necessary risk of retaliation demote or terminate communication is the key  

No, you can't sleep on the job

This blog was written by Shelby Skeabeck, formerly of Shawe Rosenthal, author of our Maryland Human Resources Manual. You can find the original blog post here and their Labor & Employment Report newsletter (which is excellent) here.   No, You Can’t Sleep on the Job, Especially when it’s...

"We need to talk" isn't any easier to say than to hear

This blog was written by Mathew Parker at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. You can find the original here and their On the Front Lines Workplace Law Newsletter (which is excellent) here.   We Need to Talk: 5 Tips For Conducting Difficult Workplace Conversations ...

Zero tolerance for "zero tolerance" policies

Zero tolerance for "zero tolerance" policies "Zero tolerance" is too blunt an instrument, and it may even increase bad behavior. Chai Feldblum, a Democratic Commissioner of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, was quoted this week as saying that "zero tolerance" policies can actuall...

Termination Series: Communicating the reason for discharge

Do employers need to provide a reason to a discharged employee? Federal law does not require employers to provide terminated employees with a written explanation for their discharge. However, many states have litigation in place that calls for an employer to provide documentation outlining the...

Firing, a job to do right the first time

"You’re fired." On The Apprentice, Donald Trump made it look so easy! For the rest of us, a poorly done termination could be costly. Emotions run high, there is a lot of paperwork involved, and an employer can end up with a big mess on their hands. Taking the time to do a termination properly can...