No-match letters from the SSA - read and understand, then react
May 22nd, 2019 by Davis Bae, Shanon Stevenson and Jeffrey Winchester at Fisher Phillips
An Employer’s 7-Step Guide To Navigating Newly Revived No-Match Letters
The Social Security Administration recently resurrected its practice of issuing Employer Correction Request notices – also known as “no-match letters” – when it receives employee information from an employer that does not match its records. If you find yourself in receipt of such a letter, we recommend you take the following seven steps in conjunction with working with your Fisher Phillips counsel.
Step 1: Understand The Letter
The first and perhaps most obvious step is to read the letter carefully and understand what it says. Too often employers rush into action before taking the time to read and understand the no-match letter.
What Does The Letter Say?
The letter usually starts off notifying you that the Administration received one or more W-2s from you on which the employee’s name did not match the Social Security Number in the Administration’s database. The letter explains that the Administration considers this is to be important, as it wants employees to get the benefits they are entitled to receive.
As the letter notes, there are many possible reasons for SSN/name mismatches, including typographical errors (e.g., the name is spelled wrong on the W-4, or a number is transposed in the SSN), name changes that haven’t yet been reported (due to marriage, divorce, or other reason), or inaccurate input of the SSN on the W-2. There are other possible reasons for a mismatch, including identity theft, domestic violence, and witness protection status. Sometimes no-matches can be generated by a simple missing middle initial or a missing hyphen in an employee’s hyphenated last name.
The no-match letter asks you to log onto a website called the Business Services Online (BSO) to learn the names of those who have been identified as no-matches and to provide the Administration with “necessary corrections to the Form W-2C within 60 days of receipt of this letter so we can maintain an accurate earnings record for each employee and make sure your employees get the benefits they are due.”
Please note that the requirements for responding to a mismatch notice from the Internal Revenue Service differs from the requirements for responding to a no-match letter from the Social Security Administration. Make sure that you are sure which federal agency sent you this letter and call your counsel with any questions.
What The Letter Does NOT Say
The no-match letter is not a notification that the Administration believes you or the named employee intentionally submitted the wrong name or SSN. Nor does the letter call into question any employees’ immigration status or work authorization. Indeed, the letter includes an unambiguous warning that you are not to take any adverse employment action against any employee because of the letter “such as laying off, suspending, firing, or discriminating against any individual, just because his or her SSN or name does not match our records.” Such action, according to the letter, could be a violation of “State or Federal Law and [could] subject you to legal consequences.” It would behoove you to take this warning seriously.
Step 2: Gauge The Potential Impact On Your Business
The no-match letter provides two pieces of useful information right off the bat: (a) the number of alleged mismatches and (b) the tax year at issue. If, on one hand, the letter indicates that a small number of employees have been identified as no-matches, the potential impact of an internal review of the no-matches on your business is likely to be small.
On the other hand, if the number is large, operations could be significantly affected by an internal review of SSN no-matches and by interviews with identified employees. Keep in mind that, once word gets out that the company is asking employees about their Social Security Numbers, employees may quit even if they are not in the identified group.
Step 3: Review Your Employee Records
Next, take the time to review your records. Specifically, make sure you examine the names provided to the company by your employees and the SSNs provided by your employees on their W-4 Forms, and then compare them to the information provided to the SSA for the year in question. Look for typos, name changes, transposed digits, missing middle initials, or other innocent mistakes. Doing so will help you determine whether the issues are truly clerical or potentially problematic.
Step 4: Determine What Employee Handbook, CBA Provisions, Or Other Policies Might Apply
While some no-matches may turn out to be due to clerical errors or other innocuous reasons mentioned above, some may not. Again, a no-match does not mean that the employee is not authorized to work legally in the United States. What it does mean, however, is that the employee – willfully or not – may have provided you with false information.
Accordingly, it is important to identify the policies in place that may apply to this situation. Check your Social Security Number mismatch policy, if you have one. Check the policies that address candor in the workplace and address the consequences of employees providing you with false information. It is also important to know how those policies have been enforced in recent years. If, for example, an employee provided false information about their prior job experience, degree, date of birth, or any other similar information, what discipline, if any, did your company issue? The key here is consistency and determining before beginning any inquiry what the likely penalty will be in the event it is determined that an employee provided a false SSN at the time of hire. As with all workplace policies, inconsistent enforcement can lead to claims of discrimination.
Moreover, if your company has employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement or otherwise represented by a labor union, and if there is a possibility of discipline or termination of employment if the mismatch cannot be resolved, the union may get involved. Some courts have held that simply receiving notice of a SSN mismatch does not provide you with sufficient “just cause” to terminate employment under typical labor law analysis, even where the employee is given a chance to resolve the mismatch and fails to do so. Also, employees may invoke Weingartenrights if and when called in to meet with HR about the mismatch.
Step 5: Take Extremely Cautious Action
Now that you have gauged your possible exposure, you should consider next steps. Some companies may decide to stick their heads into the sand and not to log onto the BSO website. We strongly recommend against disregarding the no-match letter. If your company has received one or more no-match letters and has done nothing about them, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could, permissibly or impermissibly, view your failure to take action as proof that you had constructive knowledge of potential immigration issues. Also, if it turns out that the no-match at issue was due to identity theft, an employee could claim that your failure to log onto the site ended up causing economic damage to the employee.
We anticipate and recommend that most employers will choose to log onto the BSO website and begin the formal process of addressing the no-match letter. If you have not already done so, this would a good time to contact your Fisher Phillips attorney to guide you through the process of responding to the information on the BSO website.
Before Notifying Employees Of A No-Match Letter
Check Payroll And Other Records Again. Now that you have specific information on the employees identified by the Administration, check your records against the Administration’s notice. Is the name misspelled? Are the SSNs close, with one incorrect number or two numbers transposed? Has the employee reported a name change to you but not yet followed up with the Social Security Administration? Identifying possible reasons for the mismatch before doing anything else is critical.
Re-Assess The Potential Impact On Your Business. Once the employees at issue have been identified, you can more precisely assess the potential impact on your operations in the event some or most of those employees quit. How quickly could replacements be found? Is your business approaching an all-hands-on-deck event or time of year, or could your business tolerate sudden departures with little or no disruption?
Do NOT Use the Letter To Demand New I-9s. Statistically, some 70 percent of no-match letters issued by the Administration involve employees who were not born in the United States. Requiring employees who were identified in the letter to fill out new I-9s runs the risk of claims of discrimination claims and lawsuits.
Once you have addressed these initial issues, begin notifying the identified employees about the letter. Remember, continue paying payroll taxes for all identified employees, regardless of the no-match notice. Here are some suggested protocols for notifying employees:
Meet Individually With Each Employee In A Private Meeting Space. Two representatives of HR/management should be present (but not the employee’s supervisor or anyone in the direct chain of command). Tell the employee that the company has been notified that the SSN you have on file does not match the employee’s name. Instruct the employee to resolve the issue with the Social Security Administration and to report back as to their progress within 30 days. As a courtesy, you may provide the employee with the telephone number and address of the nearest Social Security Administration office.
Confirm Your Instructions In Writing. At the meeting, hand the employee a letter (a copy of which you retain) recapping the points covered in the meeting. The letter should include a maximum timeframe by which you expect to hear back from the employee to resolve the issue. The best practice is to ask the employee to try to resolve the issue within 30 days (remember, the SSA requests that you address the issue within 60 days). Take into account the individual’s circumstances and be reasonably flexible if they need to take more than 30 days. Attach to the letter a copy of applicable policies and refer to them in the letter. Have the employee sign and date receipt of the letter and keep that copy in the employee’s personnel file.
Document And Be Prepared To Take Action. Take good notes of this meeting, especially of the employee’s response to the notification. In the event an employee admits during the meeting (or at any time) that they are undocumented or otherwise admits that they may not lawfully work in the United States, be prepared to terminate their employment immediately. The penalties for knowingly employing a person who is not lawfully permitted to work in the U.S. can include monetary penalties (ranging from $573 to $22,927 per undocumented employee depending on whether it is your first, second, or third offense, loss of government contracts, loss of a business license, and even potential jail time of six months to ten years.
Keep A Chart Regarding Notice And Timing. Track the dates of the meeting and when you provided your employees with notice about the no-match letter, and follow up with those who have not reported back at the 30-day mark. Keep good records as to what each employee tells you about their efforts to resolve the issue.
What Should You Do If The Issue Is Not Timely Resolved?
If the employee continues to delay reporting progress towards a resolution or seems to be taking an inordinately long time to resolve the matter, consider sending reminders to the employee’s home address. The reminder should inform the employee of the date you provided them with the notification (include a copy of the original notice), and any subsequent communications you have had with them about the issue.
If the issue has not been resolved after a reasonable time has passed, and the employee does not appear to be making efforts to resolve the issue, meet with management and legal counsel to discuss next steps. If you have received additional information from any other source that the individual may not be authorized to work in the U.S., you should provide this information to your legal counsel so that you can review the employee’s I-9 and the new information with your counsel to determine if further action is required, including possible termination.
What If The Issue Is Resolved But You Still Have Suspicions?
This is indeed a challenging question. Remember, there are perfectly good reasons for mismatches: clerical errors, difficult-to-spell names, name changes, domestic violence, etc. But what if the employee produces an entirely new SSN, or presents the same SSN as originally provided but informs you of an entirely new name?
The key is to investigate the circumstances underlying the new number or name. Did the Administration issue a new number because of domestic violence or identify theft? Was the name changed as part of an immigration or other court proceeding? Does the employee have no explanation for the new number or new name?
If there is no plausible explanation for the new number or new name, you must then consider your SSN mismatch policy and your policies relating to the employee’s duty to provide true and correct information as part of their employment, as described above. You must also consider your prior enforcement of those policies.
If you make a decision to discipline or terminate the employee, remember that the decision must not be based on a suspicion that the employee does not have the legal right to work in the United States or solely on the Employer Correction Request notice without additional evidence. You may receive evidence of an employee’s undocumented status from many different sources, including the IRS, local law enforcement, medical insurance providers, and 401k plan administrators.
Step 6: Respond To The Social Security Administration
After you have reviewed the no-matches on the BSO website and taken action to address the no-matches, the Administration asks that you file Forms W-2C informing the Administration of corrections to employees’ names and Social Security Numbers. Be sure to carefully follow the instructions for filing these forms.
In addition to filing forms W-2C for those employees for whom the no-match can be identified and rectified, we suggest sending a letter to the SSA office that issued the no-match letter, advising it of the status of the remaining identified employees – for example, the employee is not currently employed at your company, the employee notified you and indicated that their SSN is correct, the employee notified you that they are consulting with the SSA to address issue, etc.
Step 7: Assess Your I-9 Compliance
Now that you have a better handle on the number and nature of SSN no-matches, you should engage in a review of your I-9 compliance. This can be a particularly tricky step, given that the stated purpose of the SSN’s no-match letter is to track benefits, not call into question immigration status of employees. That is why you should work with their Fisher Phillips attorneys to conduct a review of your I-9s.
Review your I-9 policies and procedures. Does every employee hired after November 6, 1986 have an I-9? Who is responsible for processing I-9s and have those employees been trained? Are all of the required sections filled out? Were they timely completed? Are I-9s for terminated employees being purged in a timely manner? These are just a few of the questions that should be asked about your I-9 records and processes.
Consider conducting a compliance review of a random sampling of I-9s to determine whether a full review is warranted. If a full review is warranted, work with your legal counsel to address and correct errors (to the extent they are correctable). While there is no indication that the Administration’s issuing of a SSA no-match letter will trigger an automatic ICE I-9 audit, this is a good opportunity to get a handle on potential liability and address any issues in the event one were to occur.
The Social Security Administration’s decision to re-start issuing no-match letters places employers in a no-win situation. If you do not log onto the BSO website, the government could infer that you knew of a potential problem with undocumented employees. On the other hand, if you log on to the BSO website, you cannot simply ignore the information contained on the website but rather must make a good-faith effort to address the issue.
Now that the SSA is back in the business of issuing no-match letters, and given that an estimated 11 million undocumented individuals live in the United States, you can get ahead of this issue by taking proactive steps to make sure names and SSNs of new hires match at the time of hiring. Moving forward, well before getting a SSA no-match letter, you should review your I-9s to gauge whether there is any potential exposure and revisit policies and procedures for verifying the accuracy of new hires’ I-9s, consider using E-Verify for new hires, and use the Social Security Number Verification Service for payroll reporting purposes.
We will continue to assess the situation and provide necessary updates should any further developments occur, so you should ensure you are subscribed to Fisher Phillips’ alert system to gather the most up-to-date information. If you have questions, please contact your Fisher Phillips attorney or any attorney in our Global Immigration Practice Group.
This blog was written by Davis Bae, Shanon Stevenson and Jeffrey Winchester at Fisher Phillips, which authors our South Carolina Human Resources Manual, Model Policies and Forms for Missouri Employers, Model Policies and Forms for Kansas Employers, and Workplace Safety and Health Compliance Manual. You can find the original article and more Legal Alerts on their website.
Trends in criminal enforcement
During the Bush Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shifted its enforcement philosophy to emphasize criminal sanctions over fines. Julie L. Myers, then Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for ICE, compared fines for unlawful hiring prac...
Recent New York Legislation Prohibits Employers From Threatening to Report an Employee's Suspected Immigration Status in Retaliation for Labor Law Complaints
New York has for many years had a law on the books that prohibits employers from retaliating against an employee because the employee ha...
So say an employee, let's call him, for purposes of this exercise, Scott Edward Nall, walks into your office to let you know he has changed his name to Optimus Prime. Do you:
snicker and ask him if his Laser Axe Hand is really made of energy
wonder why he isn't riding a dinosaur
This blog was written by Melissa Manna at Ogletree Deakins, authors of our Model Policies and Forms for Tennessee Employers, Massachusetts Human Resources Manual, Colorado Human Resources Manual, and Employee Benefits – An Employer's Guide. You can find the original blog post and their Immigratio...
If your first reaction to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid would be "Ice. ICE! Baby." and a slow exhale/shaking head, then read this from our our authors at Fisher Phillips now, which includes:
background: heat has been turned up in 2018
what you can do to prepare: 5-step...
The Clock Is Ticking On Changes Required Now That The Governor Has Signed SB 75, Which Includes The Workplace Transparency Act
On Friday, August 9, 2019, Governor Pritzker signed SB 75, as part of a massive overhaul of employment laws that were passed by the Legislature earlier this year, and...
This blog was written by Aaron Warshaw at Ogletree Deakins, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Tennessee Employers, Massachusetts Human Resources Manual, Colorado Human Resources Manual, and Employee Benefits – An Employer's Guide. You can find the original blog post and their Our Ins...
Biometric Compliance for Employers
With many employers embracing new technology to achieve efficiencies in the workplace, companies using increasingly popular biometric programs must take steps to ensure that the use of these systems does not violate the law in several jurisdictions.
This blog was written by Danielle Krauthamer and Setareh Ebrahimian at Fisher Phillips, which authors our South Carolina Human Resources Manual, Model Policies and Forms for Missouri Employers, Model Policies and Forms for Kansas Employers, and Workplace Safety and Health Compliance Manual. You c...
It happens in almost every workplace almost every day: somebody swears or is on an iffy website or is carrying a knife (or worse) or is using their own (not secure) phone or computer to send off a quick business email or text.
So what is illegal, what is inappropriate and what is just not that...
This blog was written by Deidra Nguyen at Littler Mendelson, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Maine Employers. You can find the original post and their Dear Littler (which is excellent) on their website.
Dear Littler: What is the Story with Employee Election Leave?
This blog was written by Adam Gutmann at Cozen O'Connor, which authors our Minnesota Human Resources Manual, New York Human Resources Manual, and Pennsylvania Human Resources Manual. You can find the original post and their HR Headaches blog (good stuff) on their website.
Halloween in the Work...
This blog was written by Robin Shea at Constangy, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Georgia Employers and our New Jersey Human Resources Manual. You can find the original on their Employment & Labor Insider blog (which is one of our favorites and is excellent).
llinois Employers Should Review Expense Reimbursement Policies
Effective January 1, 2019, Illinois will statutorily require employers to reimburse employees for work-related expenses. This requirement comes as an amendment to the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act (IW...
This blog was written by Tina Syring at Cozen O'Connor, which authors our Minnesota Human Resources Manual, New York Human Resources Manual, and Pennsylvania Human Resources Manual. You can find the original post and their HR Headaches blog (good stuff) on their website.
Do You Know What ...
This blog was written by David Broderick at Littler Mendelson, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Maine Employers.
Dear Littler: Do We Have to Accommodate A Religious Objection to the Flu Shot?
David Broderick at Littler Mendelson
Dear Littler: I work in a health care setting...
This blog was written by Debra Friedman, contributor to our New York Human Resources Manual, at Cozen O'Connor, which also authors our Pennsylvania Human Resources Manual and Minnesota Human Resources Manual. You can find the original post and their HR Headaches blog (good stuff) on their website...
No call. No show. Assume they quit. Find a replacement. Move on.
Then who shows up but Ms. Nocall Noshow.
Depends on what happened, your policy, potential laws (ADA? FMLA?), disabilities, stuff, junk.
SHRM helps, with help from our author Fisher Phillips and long-time friend...
This blog was written by Natasha Sarah-Lorraine Banks at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources.
When Strict Dress Codes Went Out Of Style: The Modernization Of Workwear
“Every day is a fashion show, and the world is your runway.” – Unknown
This modern-day old adage giv...
This blog was written by William S. Rutchow at Ogletree Deakins, author of our Model Policies and Forms for Tennessee Employers. Ogletree also authors our Massachusetts Human Resources Manual, Colorado Human Resources Manual, and Employee Benefits – An Employer's Guide. You can find the original ...
This blog was written by Danielle Krauthamer at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. You can find the original post and the On the Front Lines newsletter on their website.
Pawternity Leave: Are Employers Barking Up the Wrong Tree With Pet-Based Leave?
We’ve all hear...
This blog was written by Jason Plowman at Polsinelli. Polsinelli authors hrsimple resources in Missouri, Kansas and Illinois. You can find the original blog post and their labor and employment blog Polsinelli at Work (which is excellent) on their website.
Back to School Edition: School-...
This blog was written by Spencer Waldron at Fisher Phillips, which authors several of our resources. You can find the original post and the Employment Privacy Blog (which is excellent) on their website.
How Much Do You Really Want to Know About Your Employees? The Growing Popularity of Co...
Service animal pop quiz (yes/no):
The ADA permits assistance dogs to be with their person where members of the public can go (yes)
The ADA requires service dogs to be professionally trained (no)
Minature horses are covered under the ADA and Great Danes can be the size of miniature horse...
This blog was written by Seth Ford and Matt Anderson at Troutman Sanders, author of the Georgia Human Resources Manual. You can find the original article and their HR Law Matters blog on their website.
A Plan for Saying No: How to Refuse Service
Refusing to serve a patron is a hot topic...
Spend 20 minutes with Ruthie Goodboe from our author Ogletree Deakins as she discusses employer work rules and employee handbook policies and practices in the podcast What's the deal with employee handbook rules?
List 10 up:
covers union AND non-union workers
This blog was written by Shelby Skeabeck, formerly of Shawe Rosenthal, author of our Maryland Human Resources Manual. You can find the original blog post here and their Labor & Employment Report newsletter (which is excellent) here.
No, You Can’t Sleep on the Job, Especially when it’s...
Are Your Employees “Slackers”? How Employers Should Handle Slack—The Increasingly Popular Instant Messaging Application
Launched in 2014, Slack is the fastest growing business application in history. For those unfamiliar with this piece of technology, Slack is a cloud-based “team collaborati...
Zero tolerance for "zero tolerance" policies
"Zero tolerance" is too blunt an instrument, and it may even increase bad behavior.
Chai Feldblum, a Democratic Commissioner of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, was quoted this week as saying that "zero tolerance" policies can actuall...
Traditionally, most companies have offered a paid leave package to employees that differentiates between vacation, personal and sick days. However, combining all categories into a single paid time off (PTO) bank is a growing trend. A PTO model increases employee flexibility and has the potential ...
This blog was written by Fiona Ong at Shawe Rosenthal, author of our Maryland Human Resources Manual. You can find the original blog post here and their Labor & Employment Report newsletter (which is excellent) here.
NLRB Issues New (And More Balanced) Guidance on Handbook Rules
Guidelines for a Valid No-Solicitation/No-Distribution Policy
Many employers would like to ensure that employees focus on their work during their working time – after all, that’s what they’re being paid to do! One way employers attempt to prevent distractions is by implementing a policy that p...
When you took your job in HR, you knew that you would have to face some uncomfortable situations: terminations, poor performance reviews, disciplinary actions, but perhaps the worst of all is the “we need to talk about your personal hygiene” conversation. Your staff’s poor personal hygiene can ne...
Remote workers and telecommuting
Millions of employees work during normal business hours from a home office with the support of computers, Internet, faxes, telephones, smartphones and tablets. From 2008 to 2014, the percent of employers allowing telecommuting on a regular basis rose from 23%...
This blog is an excerpt from our book Employment Verification – An Employer’s Guide to Immigration, Form I-9 and E-Verify by David Selden and Julie Pace at The Cavanagh Law Firm. For more information, go to the Products tab above and click on "Federal" to subscribe.
For many years, an emp...
Needless to say, a company can’t operate (let alone succeed) if the employees aren’t showing up to work. But how do you ensure that your workforce will consistently report for duty? One good step is having a clear attendance policy. Communicating clearly about what are acceptable reasons to miss ...
It is not unusual for multiple members of a family to work for the same employer. However, such situations can be troublesome if the family members are in a superior-subordinate relationship because:
the relationship may give rise to favoritism or to suspicions of it
the subordinate fami...
Immigration enforcement is a major priority for the Trump Administration. Work site enforcement and I-9 audits and inquiries by ICE have been increasing and they will continue to increase. In addition to this, yet another new I-9 form was issued in 2017. All employers must use the new Form I-9 du...
Arizona sick day policy
Julie A. Pace, The Cavanagh Law Firm
This blog comes directly from the Arizona Human Resources Manual. If you are an hrsimple.com member, just log in and go to Chapter 21, Personnel manuals and policies.
Beginning on July 1, 2017, under Arizona law, all employees ...
Not all employers provide employees with vacation time, but for those who do it is wise to have a clear, well-enforced policy in place to prevent confusion and help employees understand what steps need to be followed in order to use their time off. If employers decide to provide time off they nee...
While there may be no state or federal law requiring an employer to have a handbook, there are a number or reasons why they are in an employer’s best interest.
Usefulness. It is beneficial for there to be one definitive source on the terms of employment. If an employee ever has a question ...