"Fat shaming" at work can cost more than money, a lot of money

April 22nd, 2019

Robin Shea at Constagy

"Fat shaming" costs employer big bucks

Buff employers, beware!

A jury recently awarded $500 grand to a restaurant server in Las Vegas for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The server claimed that a sign calling him "Fat Andy" was posted at his wait station and was left there for several months, even though he'd made repeated requests to management that it be taken down. (The sign was supposedly in a plexiglass case, so the plaintiff could not remove it himself.)

According to the lawsuit, the sign was not removed until the restaurant closed.

A federal district judge in Nevada had granted summary judgment to the employer, the Bellagio, on the plaintiff's claims, which were originally for national origin discrimination and intentional infliction. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that the intentional infliction claim should go to trial.

And the rest is history.

In my opinion, the lower court had it right. Fat-shaming is bad, but I don't think the particular behavior alleged in this lawsuit is nearly bad enough to amount to "intentional infliction of emotional distress." The legal claim requires behavior (1) that is "extreme and outrageous," (2) that is "intended to cause severe emotional distress," (or engaged in with "reckless disregard" for whether it would cause severe emotional distress) and (3) that does in fact cause severe emotional distress. The plaintiff has the burden of proof on all three elements.

The "extreme and outrageous" requirement is a stringent one. Rude or insensitive behavior doesn't cut it. Instead, the behavior must be "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized society."

Even assuming the "Fat Andy" sign was rude and hurtful, I don't see how it meets this very difficult legal standard.

And I have a problem with the second element, too. Did the employer (or co-workers) "intend" to cause the plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress? Did they think severe emotional distress was likely to result and just didn't care? Or, on the other hand, was it simply a case of workplace teasing that went too far, coupled with employer negligence? If the latter, then there's no "intent."

That said, employers should be careful if they see that co-workers' teasing about weight (or other sensitive topics) may be unwelcome to the target of the jokes. Employers should never ignore such behavior, much less join in the "fun."

Another thing to keep in mind is that -- depending on how overweight the employee is, and the cause of the weight problem -- this could be considered unlawful harassment based on a disability, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act or state disability-rights laws. A number of federal courts have said that obesity is not usually a "disability" within the meaning of the ADA. However, if the obesity is so severe that it substantially limits an employee's major life activities, or if it is caused by some other medical condition (or medications that the employee is taking to treat or relieve a medical condition), then the target of the teasing could be protected.

(Thanks very much to Lisa Yumi Mitchell in our San Francisco Office, who alerted me to this verdict!)

This blog was written by Robin Shea at Constangy, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Georgia Employers and our New Jersey Human Resources Manual. You can find the original on their Employment & Labor Insider blog (which is one of our favorites and is excellent).

Reasons for FMLA leave
Tourette syndrome, the ADA and racial harassment
Make your workplace a SUE-free zone
Court weighs evidence – bus (driver)'s obesity not a disability
Measles in the workplace – just the FAQs ma’am
Obesity - disability, impairment, disease? Depends
Workplace Christmas Quiz (this is legit and will secondarily eat up some time before you get to go home)
Depression – what can an employer do?
Disability – Dr. or employee approved?
Disability/pregnancy practices – what not to practice
Bad mix – accommodation request and firing
I'll take "ADA in 5s?" please Alex
Being at work full time is not an essential function of a job?
Treating service animal requests (always treat the animal)
Job tasks and essential functions under the ADA
No, you can't sleep on the job
"We need to talk" isn't any easier to say than to hear
Is the employee "disabled" under the ADA?
How to approach an employee showing signs of cognitive decline
What is the ADA?
Dr. Love(less) he don't need no office life
IA Waterloo - Will Ban the Box be your Waterloo?
Murder by Death
The Royal Tenenbaums
Knives Out
No-match letters – IRS alert or Charles Nelson Reilly game show?
Second-guessing the advice columns: Get off my lawn!
IL Artificial hiring, salary history, required training, etc.
Retaliation (wait . for . it . . . ) is all about the timing
NY Additional workplace protections for victims of domestic violence
Randy Newman, racism and rednecks
Look past the laws (pudding) and understand the regs (Oreo)
NY 11 employment laws you missed if you blinked (not 10)
IL Tidal wave (or tsunami) of new laws for Illinois employers
NY Reporting immigration status can be unneighborly . . . at best
RIF - Reductions In Force Require Initial Fundamentals
One step beyond March Madness
Why You Should Care About Employment Law
MeToo, avoiding women, and the modified Mike Pence Rule
Discrimination CHARGE! – Step 3 Cause or no cause, because you gotta do something
Discrimination CHARGE! – Step 2 Go Kim Possible for the investigation phase
Discrimination CHARGE! – Step 1 Don't panic, ask questions
If Saint Valentine had a workplace romance policy what would it be
Workplace romance red (heart-shaped) flags
Super Bowl LIII and getting fired from your G.O.A.T.
How to Address an Unflattering Video of an Employee
Holiday party what-would-you-dos
Holiday stew – ingredients for a happy and non-litigious holiday
Swearing at work – 7 rules
NY: Draft model sexual harassment policy/training released
Round up stew: sick leave, harassment, non-compete, etc.
Should you give your employees a little Slack – or do they have enough already?