Employers beware - what you say can and will be used against you

November 20th, 2018 by Darryl McCallum at Shawe Rosenthal


This blog was written by Darryl McCallum at Shawe Rosenthal, author of our Maryland Human Resources Manual. You can find the original and their Labor & Employment Report blog on their website.

 

Employers Beware: What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You!

Darryl McCallum

Any HR professional who has dealt with the Family and Medical Leave Act knows that determining when and how the statute applies can be very tricky.  One thing that is clear, however, is that employees who have worked for less than one year and have not worked a total of 1250 hours are not eligible for FMLA leave and thus are not protected by the statute.  Or so we thought!  A case from last week, Reif v. Assisted Living by Hillcrest, LLC, dispels the notion that employees who have worked for less than a year are never subject to the protections of the FMLA.

The employee in that case worked as an administrative assistant at an assisted living facility. After she began experiencing hip and knee pain, she learned from her doctor that she would need surgery to correct the problem.  At the time, she had been working for her employer for less than a year.  She informed the human resources coordinator at her facility that she intended to take time off to have the surgery once she became eligible for FMLA.  The human resources coordinator allegedly told the employee that she could take FMLA leave once she reached her one-year anniversary, which was approximately two weeks away.  Accordingly, the employee scheduled her surgery for a date shortly after she became FMLA-eligible.

The human resources coordinator, after consulting with the head of the facility where the employee worked, later told the employee that she needed to send her home because she was a liability to the company and they did not want her to injure herself further and file a worker’s compensation claim against the company.  In addition, according to the employee, the human resources coordinator told her that she needed to schedule her surgery as soon as possible and that she would work with her to get her FMLA approved (even though she had not yet worked a full year).  She also indicated to the employee that her job would be available once she was able to return to work.

Based on these alleged statements, the employee submitted an FMLA application with a leave start date that was before her one-year anniversary and moved her surgery up from the date it had been originally scheduled.  A few days after her surgery, the employee received a letter acknowledging her FMLA request but stating that she was not eligible for FMLA.  Her doctor provided a note saying she could return to work with certain work restrictions, including that she not put weight on her right leg and that she use an assistive device for mobility in order to perform her job duties.  Nonetheless, the employer informed the employee that her position was no longer available.

The employee filed suit, claiming that the employer interfered with her attempt to take FMLA leave and discriminated against her on account of such attempt.  The employer filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the employee was not an “eligible employee” under the FMLA at the time she requested leave and had her surgery.  In denying the employer’s motion, the court noted that the employer “would be on solid ground as far as the FMLA is concerned if [the employee] had simply taken off for her surgery on her own prior to becoming eligible for FMLA leave.”  However, the court noted, in this case, the employee was allegedly encouraged by the employer’s human resources coordinator to move her surgery up and was assured that her job would be waiting for her once she recovered.  As such, the court held, “[i]t would be fundamentally unfair to allow an employer to force an employee to begin a non-emergency medical leave less than two weeks before she would be eligible under the FMLA, assure her that she would receive leave and her job would be waiting for her when she returned, and then fire her for taking an unauthorized leave.”

This case is a textbook illustration of the importance of clear communication with employees that is backed up by written documentation.  While this ruling involved a motion to dismiss, where the employee’s allegations in the complaint are assumed to be true, if the employer took steps to document the conversations between the human resources coordinator and the employee, such as by sending e-mails to the employee, then the employer will have a much easier time defending the case.

Statements such as those alleged by the employee in the complaint make me cringe because it could expose the employer not only to FMLA liability but also to liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.  It seems to me the employee could have also alleged that she was disabled, or at least that the employer regarded her as disabled, the employer required her to take leave rather than continue working, and that the employer fired her rather than accommodate her work restrictions.  So be careful what you say and make sure to document your conversations in case an employee tries to use your statements as the basis for a lawsuit.



Can't find what you're looking for?

Sign up for free to gain access to our complete HR Library


Related posts

"Moms in the Workplace" quiz!

"Moms in the Workplace" quiz! And dads get to play, too. After all, we wouldn't be moms without you!   ;-) Happy Mother's Day weekend! How much do you know about moms in the workplace? Take our quiz and find out! As always, the answers appear at the end of each question, so you can cheat...

FMLA - speak clearly and carefully and explicitly

Be VERY CLEAR In Your Communications About FMLA! I often tell my crazy teenagers that it doesn’t matter what you mean to say – it matters what the other person actually hears. (I’m not sure they actually hear me when I say that…) And a recent Family and Medical Leave Act case proves my point a...

Better parental leave or you better believe parents leave

It’s Time To Be Creative: Historically Low Unemployment Rates Fuel New Approaches To Parental Leave In October 2018, NPR reported that the U.S. unemployment rate had dropped to 3.7 percent, the lowest rate in 50 years.  In some states, like Colorado, where I live, the rate is even lower (3.1 p...

Why You Should Care About Employment Law

Common Pitfalls for Emerging Companies Founders of emerging companies are often first-time employers and find themselves having to wade through the dense patchwork of state and federal labor and employment laws. This can be a confusing undertaking that often requires legal counsel. However, th...

Holiday stew – ingredients for a happy and non-litigious holiday

Holiday stew – we all have our own recipe, but the base is almost always the same: booze, mistletoe and a generous pinch of unapproved time off. And be sure you don't have enough time to prepare or clean up. Join Gary Wheeler and Lori Mans for an hour as they provide the ingredients and know-h...

Election leave – employer's civic duty, migraine, or just wishful thinking (election, leave!)

This blog was written by Deidra Nguyen at Littler Mendelson, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Maine Employers. You can find the original post and their Dear Littler (which is excellent) on their website.   Dear Littler: What is the Story with Employee Election Leave? Deidra...

Disability/pregnancy practices – what not to practice

This blog was written by Robin Shea at Constangy, which authors our Model Policies and Forms for Georgia Employers and our New Jersey Human Resources Manual. You can find the original on their Employment & Labor Insider blog (which is one of our favorites and is excellent).   Employers,...

FMLA leave before being eligible for FMLA leave

This blog was written by Thomas E. Reddin and Henry J. Thomas at Polsinelli. Polsinelli authors hrsimple resources in Missouri, Kansas and Illinois. You can find the original blog post and their labor and employment blog Polsinelli at Work (which is excellent) on their website.   Navigating...

No call/no show shows. No what about it.

No call. No show. Assume they quit. Find a replacement. Move on. Then who shows up but Ms. Nocall Noshow. Now what? Depends on what happened, your policy, potential laws (ADA? FMLA?), disabilities, stuff, junk. SHRM helps, with help from our author Fisher Phillips and long-time friend...

Notice: notices and forms for FMLA that were already expired now updated virtually unchanged

This blog was written by Fiona Ong at Shawe Rosenthal, author of our Maryland Human Resources Manual. You can find the original blog and their Labor & Employment Report newsletter on their website.    Time to Update Those FMLA Forms!!! Fiona W. Ong Finally! The new Family and Medi...

School-related parental leave does not mean you forge a note from your kid

This blog was written by Jason Plowman at Polsinelli. Polsinelli authors hrsimple resources in Missouri, Kansas and Illinois. You can find the original blog post and their labor and employment blog Polsinelli at Work (which is excellent) on their website.   Back to School Edition: School-...

Round up stew: sick leave, harassment, non-compete, etc.

This blog was written by Shennan Harris at Squire Patton Boggs. Shennan is a co-author of our Wages and Hours – An Employer's Guide. You can find the original blog post and their Employment Law Worldview on their website.   State Law Round-Up: New Sick Leave, Sexual Harassment Laws and Othe...

PTO on the house!

Traditionally, most companies have offered a paid leave package to employees that differentiates between vacation, personal and sick days. However, combining all categories into a single paid time off (PTO) bank is a growing trend. A PTO model increases employee flexibility and has the potential ...

No FMLA for pet's death

This blog was written by Fiona Ong at Shawe Rosenthal, our author of the Maryland Human Resources Manual. You can find the original blog post here and their Labor & Employment Report newsletter (which is excellent) here.   In a previous post about pet bereavement leave, I noted that t...

FMLA definitions

This blog is an excerpt from our book An Employer's Guide to FMLA and ADA, authored by Nancy Van der Veer Holt at Ford Harrison LLP. For more state specific leave information, go to the Products tab above and subscribe to the Human Resources Manual for your state. FMLA coverage for employers ...

FMLA - "leave" as in "leave the employee alone"

FMLA contains "leave", as in "the employee isn't at work" but also as in "leave the employee alone or else". See what the boundaries are to avoid the "or else" from one of our authors @Ogletree Deakins.

Paternity leave

What is paternity leave? Sometimes referred to as “family leave” or “parental leave”, paternity leave is an excused absence from work to care for and bond with a new child - whether by birth, adoption, or foster. This leave can vary in duration and may be paid or unpaid. Are employers requi...

Paid family leave: a growing trend

Legally mandated family leave policies have a relatively short history in the United States, and a requirement that the leave be paid is even shorter. In 1993, Congress enacted the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) after finding that employees were having to choose between working and taking ca...